memphisfasad.blogg.se

Comparison free vnc software
Comparison free vnc software









comparison free vnc software

Not even speaking about having to re-encode the Full-HD images on screen again before sending them to the VNC client.

comparison free vnc software

Some older Dual-Core machines are even at the limit when decoding Full-HD video content. However for full-screen video transfer it does not help a lot since the whole screen has to be re-transferred too often.Īs written above current machines will probably be unable to rel-time encode your screen content in Full-HD and stream it to a remote-control application since your host will have to decode the video content and then re-encode the raw images before sending them to the network. This usually saves A LOT of bandwith and processing power. First of all they try to detect the screen changes and transfer the (compressed) image of the changes only. Well, there are a couple of "tricks" which are applied by video codecs and remote control and screen-sharing utilities.

  • Less strong compression in turn will require more network bandwidth which might become an issue on low-bandwidth connections like the internet.
  • Usually such strong compression is unsuitable for real-time applications like remote control.

    #Comparison free vnc software movie

    For example encoding a 90 minutes movie in H.264 in high quality often takes more than 4 hours compression time on my Athlon X2 4450e server.

    comparison free vnc software

  • Strong compression needs a lot of CPU power.
  • If you use VNC then your host computer has to take screen snapshots and compress them before sending them on to the network. In video streaming you typically transfer a pre-compressed video stream via the network. VNC is not comparable to video streaming.











    Comparison free vnc software